DANGEROUS CHEMICALS TO BE REMOVED FROM JOHNSON & JOHNSON PRODUCTS

The organic movement has heightened the public’s awareness of potentially dangerous chemicals which may be present in their food. As a result, Americans everywhere are increasingly choosing to buy organic dairy, produce and meats. However, other dangerous products harbor chemicals which are just as hazardous, if not more so, than the pesticides and hormones present in some foods.

In response to public frustration over certain chemicals in baby and beauty products, Johnson and Johnson has recently pledged to “remove potentially cancer-causing and other dangerous chemicals from nearly all its adult toiletries and cosmetic products worldwide within 3½ years,” according to USA Today.

The New-Jersey-based pharmaceutical giant had already planned to rid “chemicals of concern” from all of its baby products as of late last year. J&J only made this move after a coalition of environmental and health safety advocates had pressured the company to do so for several years. As a result of this earlier pledge, J&J will likely have its baby products reformulated by the end of next year. If the newest pledge is fulfilled as scheduled, adult products will be retooled by December of 2015.

Some of the well-known products receiving a chemical makeover will include Desitin diaper rash cream, Johnson’s baby bath products and lotions, and adult brands Clean & Clear, Neutrogena, Aveeno, RoC and Lubriderm.

It is critical that Johnson & Johnson approaches the chemical reinvention of these products with care. Otherwise, alternative ingredients may lend themselves to reactions in consumers and other dangers associated with various beauty products.

Financial Services National Practice Group

DESCRIPTION

The Financial Services National Practice Group consists of shareholders across the country and from all disciplines who represent a wide range of domestic and international businesses that provide and use financial services. The group prides itself on the quality of its practitioners, its client base, its work product and its ability to integrate the experience of individuals from a number of disciplines such as buying a home in new jersey.

Some of the nation’s leading banks and financial institutions rely on us to handle their largest and most complicated litigation matters, including cases relating to fiduciary and trust issues, antitrust claims and loan servicing. These high-profile engagements have involved claims exceeding $1 billion and have included trial and other litigation victories. In addition,  has a long and successful record representing financial service clients in the area of consumer litigation, particularly in defending class actions and “private attorney general” actions. We are experienced in the rapidly developing law affecting such consumer claims and have obtained favorable results for clients in diverse markets.

We advise financial institutions on:

  • Secured and unsecured loans
  • Loan syndications
  • Leasing
  • Mezzanine, tax-exempt and project financing
  • Securities matters
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Regulatory matters
  • Securitizations
  • Credit enhancements
  • Other special purpose or alternative financing devices

Related Practice Groups:

At  we draw upon legal experience in multiple practice areas to build the best team for each of our clients. To learn more about related practice areas, please select from the links below.

SWIMMING FATALITY NUMBERS FOR YOUNG CHILDREN RELEASED

Earlier this month, the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) released some tragic and startling statistics. Between Memorial Day and Labor Day of this summer, 137 children under the age of 15 drowned in swimming pool accidents. In addition, nearly 170 children in that age group required the efforts of emergency responders for injuries sustained in near-fatal accidents.

The chairperson of the CPSC recently elaborated on these statistics in a release to the public. She noted that “These figures are a strong indication that child drownings are a serious public health problem. We are losing too many children to drowning, tragically cutting short these young lives and leaving families devastated.”

She continued by saying that, “while summer is ending, our vigilance in ensuring that all children pool safely must not end. With so many indoor community pools, hotel pools and spas, indoor water parks, as well as outdoor pools that remain open in warm-weather states, we must continue our efforts to remind everyone to pool safely whenever they are near the water.”

What exactly does it mean to “pool safely?” Primarily, it means keeping an eye on kids while they are in the water. Thirty-one of the deceased children drowned in the presence of others, while an additional 54 died not long after leaving an adult who remained in their immediate area. It is not enough to simply be present while children are in the water. Adults must also pay strict attention to them.

It is important for adults to understand this critical fact. Please check back later this week as we discuss the CPSC’s vision for water safety in the coming year, which will include critical adult education on the issue.

Cycling Underneath the Impact in Washington State

Generally, Washington DUI regulations affect electric cars, but there are occasions when surfaces have to choose circumstances which are not only a little ordinary. As people may run numerous devices while underneath the impact of booze, medicines, or both dUI cases are available in all shades. From ships to lawn mowers, you will find several unusual ways of transport which have not been attempted for DUI. But think about one of transportation’s common ways that an engine is involved by doesn’t? California Cycling Laws their state of California identifies bike as “every system propelled exclusively by individual energy where an individual or individuals might experience,” consequently, a bicycle doesn’t count like a “motor vehicle.” there are certainly a quantity of regulations described from the Washington State Dept of Transport that try to maintain individuals secure, but remarkably, none identifies BUI, or “biking underneath the influence.” the only real law that referrals traffic regulations is RCW 46.61.755. This regulation allows every individual who trips exactly the same privileges as motorists to a bike, and claims they’re susceptible to the exact same duties which are relevant.

If I’m Captured Cycling underneath the Impact what Goes On?

Under RCW 46.61.790, the officer may offers intoxicated cyclists undergone by authorities transport if it’s apparent he’s drunk. Law enforcement officer could also provide release a the biker that is drunk to some qualified individual apart from the official herself. The official isn’t necessary to pressure help; on the other hand, any police force official who encounters a drunk biker in California who not desire to be assisted mustn’t offer assistance that isn’t approved. With this particular being stated, whenever you experience police force within this scenario probably the most that may occur is the fact that the official will offer you to consider you someplace secure or house. He might also request when you have buddies or any family unit members who might choose up you. Within the worst-case situation, the official may impound your bicycle if he seems there’s no more choice and that you’re a risk to yourself. Whenever you achieve sobriety in this instance, you are able to recover your bicycle. Where individuals are handled just as every other driver this image is noticeably distinctive from the exact same scenario in Florida. Drunk individuals in Florida could be billed with DUI/ DWI. If charged, individuals experience to be billed having a good of $250.00 along with a misdemeanor fines. This doesn’t depend like an electric DUI cost, that will be worse Individuals in California are secure from legal costs for biking underneath the impact. The important thing to all of this may be the motor vehicle’s state’s description. In Town of Montesano v. Wells, a cyclist’s DUI sentence was overturned because of the state’s reputation that the motor car means “every automobile that will be self-propelled.” an automobile that’s self propelled may continue its since it includes an engine, while a bike is driven by your personal pressure. An experienced lawyer might help you by creating a powerful legal protection should you encounter criminal costs in Washington.

Bumbo International Trust

Four million of the popular baby seats made by Bumbo International Trust are being recalled after reports that dozens of infants have fallen out of the seats and have suffered injuries in their falls. At least 19 of these infants suffered skull fractures.
The South-Africa based company says that its products are safe if used as they are meant to be used. The company says that the chairs are made to be placed on the floor. The chairs do not have restraints as they are designed as an easy-in easy-out infant chair. Unfortunately, nearly 100 incidents were reported to the Consumer Product Safety Commission in which children had fallen out of the chairs or wiggled their way out.
Forty-five of these incidents involved babies falling out of chairs placed on tables, countertops or chairs, and 17 of these infants suffered skull fractures. At least 50 falls, however, occurred when the seats were placed at an unknown elevation or on the ground. Two of these infants suffered skull fractures and one child suffered a concussion. Even falling near to the floor poses a brain injury danger to an infant because their skulls are soft and they have no way to break their fall and may hit their head on a toy or other object, seeking the help of Cleveland lawyers to assist.
People who own these chairs can order free repair kits from the company’s website. The repair kits contain a restraining belt and also a sticker that reminds parents and caregivers not to place the chair on an elevated surface.

9th U.S. Circuit Court Immigration News

In U.S. immigration law news, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld an injunction against several key components of Senate Bill 1070 – Arizona’s highly controversial immigration law.
Senate Bill 1070 was officially signed into law by Arizona Governor Jan Brewer on April 23, 2010, and was scheduled to go into effect on July 29.
However, shortly after the bill was signed into law, the Justice Department sought a temporary injunction to prevent it from taking effect until it received a full review from the courts.
The presiding U.S. District Court Judge in the case, the Honorable Susan Bolton, granted the temporary injunction, holding that immigration matters were the domain of the federal government and that four provisions of Senate Bill 1070 were unconstitutional because they intruded upon this domain.
Specifically, Bolton’s temporary injunction covered the following four components of Senate Bill 1070:
• The section criminalizing efforts by undocumented immigrants to solicit, apply for or perform work
• The section creating a new crime of failing to apply for or possess “alien-registration papers”
• The section allowing law enforcement officials to make a warrantless arrest of a person where there is probable cause to believe that he or she committed a crime making them removable from U.S. soil
• The section mandating that all state law enforcement officials must make a reasonable attempt to ascertain the immigration status of anyone stopped, detained or arrested if there is reasonable suspicion that the person is an undocumented immigrant
The state of Arizona immediately appealed the issuance of the injunction to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Here, the appellate court ruled to uphold the temporary injunction, declaring the four components of Senate Bill 1070 to be unconstitutional.
“We simply are not persuaded that Arizona has the authority to unilaterally transform state and local law-enforcement officers into a state-controlled (Department of Homeland Security) force to carry out its declared policy of attrition,” wrote Judge Richard Paez.
The state of Arizona may now either may ask a larger panel of judges on the 9th Circuit to revisit the case (en banc) or pursue a direct appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States.
It is important to note that if the Supreme Court refuses to hear the case or if it upholds the entire decision of the 9th Circuit, the matter will return to the courtroom of Judge Bolton. Once here, the Justice Department could ask her to rule in its favor and issue a permanent injunction – something that would appear to be a near certainty in light of her prior decision.
In this scenario, the four components of Senate Bill 1070 would never become law.
Despite the latest setback, Arizona’s government officials have vowed to keep fighting.
“I’m pledged to work as hard as I can to bring the case to the U.S. Supreme Court and win it there,” said Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne.
Stay tuned for further developments in the area of U.S. immigration law …
Due to the continued complexity of immigration laws with respect to naturalization and the exposure to facing a denial of this petition, it is critical to speak with a legal professional who has extensive specialized knowledge and experience in immigration law.
This post was provided for informational purposes only and is not to be construed as legal advice and you should speak with a Vermont immigration law firm for more info.

New Cooling Blanket Limits Brain Injury in Oxygen-Deprived Babies

Neonatologist Dr. Michael Weiss of the University of Florida in Gainesville has been pioneering a new technique that can greatly reduce complications in newborns with brain injuries from lack of oxygen at birth. He and his colleagues have just completed an 18-month study of the technique, part of coordinated research at academic hospitals nationwide.
Used for newborns who have sustained a mild to moderate brain injury due to oxygen deprivation or low blood supply, the technique involves wrapping the baby in a special blanket constructed with cold water tubes inside. The blanket cools the baby’s body temperature to about 91 degrees, slowing the body systems, reducing energy requirements and reducing swelling in the brain.  Florida lawyers are already on the case.
The technique has been shown to reduce the risk of cerebral palsy, seizures and death in newborns with moderate brain injuries, as well as to result in improved vision and cognitive and motor skills.
“What it does is it decreases the amount of cerebral edema, or swelling, around the brain. It can also decrease cell death and decrease the release of excitatory factors, which can cause brain injury. It also decreases the inflammation that’s typically seen after brain injury,” Dr. Weiss told Ivanhoe Broadcast News recently.
Four Out of Every 1,000 Babies Born in the U.S. Suffer Brain Injuries
Brain injuries caused by oxygen deprivation can occur because of a number of different complications at birth. For example, the placenta may separate prematurely, the umbilical cord may become wrapped around the child’s neck, or the cord can come out before the baby is actually born. These types of birth injuries may be unavoidable or due to medical malpractice.
Infant asphyxia can cause cerebral palsy, cognitive and motor problems, blindness and developmental problems.
“Before the cooling blanket, we really didn’t have any therapies that were brain-specific, so before, we would just provide supportive care for these babies. By cooling the babies, it actually decreases the amount of brain injury these babies have,” said Dr. Weiss.
“I really thought it was going to be some high-end, high-tech procedure,” one mother whose child was helped by the procedure told Ivanhoe. “It amazes me that something like that could save or help you know a little baby’s life.”