Surgery can be a scary prospect. Whether you are scheduled for minor skin cancer surgery or a triple bypass on your heart, allowing yourself to go under the knife can produce understandable anxiety.

One fact that may help calm your nerves is that if you schedule your surgery in the morning, you will be at a lower risk for surgical errors than you would be if you scheduled your surgery for the afternoon, according to Duke University researchers.

There are two fundamental reasons why afternoon surgical patients are at a higher risk for surgical errors. The first is that mid-afternoon is when most surgical teams experience a shift change. As a result, your team could even change mid-surgery. Most shifts in surgical wards begin at 6:30 or 7:00 a.m. When factoring in a standard work day with a standard lunch break, mid to late afternoon surgeries are often affected by this shift.

In addition, a biological factor plays into patient safety during afternoon surgery. Between roughly 3:00 and 5:00 p.m. the human body experiences a natural dip in circadian rhythms. These rhythms affect our brain wave activity as well as our alertness. For many people, this dip results in a normal feeling of sleepiness. This circadian dip does not benefit patients being treated by sleepy doctors.

Duke researchers determined that patients are most at risk when they schedule surgeries to begin between 3:00 and 4:00 p.m. However, the safest bet may be to schedule your surgery on a day when it can be performed first thing in the morning.


Three Car Accidents Reported In The Same Area Of Orange County

An area along toll road 241 has been the site of three car accidents on the same rainy Saturday in Orange County. California Highway Patrol officers responded to the scene of the first accident around 1:30 p.m on November 20th. The accident involved a white truck that skidded off the road and struck a utility pole. Only minutes after this incident occurred, three more cars were involved in a second wreck along the wet road. The cars involved slid off the highway during a collision between them. Although there were injuries in both wrecks, no one was taken to the hospital. A third wreck was caused when a car lost control and rear-ended a California Highway Patrol vehicle at the scene. No injuries were reported in that crash but traverse city personal injury lawyers have been retained.

While a quarter of Saturday’s wrecks remarkably occurred in the same location in Orange County, nine additional wrecks were also reported. California Highway Patrol officials say that rain was a factor in these accidents. A connector to the northbound 405 freeway was closed due to a serious accident on the westbound 22 freeway that rendered the roadway unsafe. This information was obtained from a SigAlert issued by police. Southbound on the 405 freeway, two cars were involved in a crash in which one vehicle ended up off the road and another was seen to be facing in the wrong direction. The crash occurred near the Westminster Ave off-ramp around 9 a.m. Around the same time, another car struck a pole on the northbound 55 freeway. The pole’s light was knocked out, but the pole itself was still standing after the crash. On the northbound 5 freeway south of Jamboree multiple lanes were blocked due to a two-car crash near the center freeway divider.

Ambulances responded to two car accidents in Orange County on Saturday. One of the accidents occurred on the East Seventh Street on-ramp to the 605 freeway and another occurred on the eastbound 91 freeway. A car and a van collided and were blocking the fast lane on eastbound 91.

At 9:30 a.m. a black Mitsubishi may have hit the center divider on southbound 405. A tan Cadillac did strike the center divider on the Knott Avenue on-ramp to the eastbound freeway 91. California Highway Patrol responded to all accidents.





The organic movement has heightened the public’s awareness of potentially dangerous chemicals which may be present in their food. As a result, Americans everywhere are increasingly choosing to buy organic dairy, produce and meats. However, other dangerous products harbor chemicals which are just as hazardous, if not more so, than the pesticides and hormones present in some foods.

In response to public frustration over certain chemicals in baby and beauty products, Johnson and Johnson has recently pledged to “remove potentially cancer-causing and other dangerous chemicals from nearly all its adult toiletries and cosmetic products worldwide within 3½ years,” according to USA Today.

The New-Jersey-based pharmaceutical giant had already planned to rid “chemicals of concern” from all of its baby products as of late last year. J&J only made this move after a coalition of environmental and health safety advocates had pressured the company to do so for several years. As a result of this earlier pledge, J&J will likely have its baby products reformulated by the end of next year. If the newest pledge is fulfilled as scheduled, adult products will be retooled by December of 2015.

Some of the well-known products receiving a chemical makeover will include Desitin diaper rash cream, Johnson’s baby bath products and lotions, and adult brands Clean & Clear, Neutrogena, Aveeno, RoC and Lubriderm.

It is critical that Johnson & Johnson approaches the chemical reinvention of these products with care. Otherwise, alternative ingredients may lend themselves to reactions in consumers and other dangers associated with various beauty products.


Financial Services National Practice Group


The Financial Services National Practice Group consists of shareholders across the country and from all disciplines who represent a wide range of domestic and international businesses that provide and use financial services. The group prides itself on the quality of its practitioners, its client base, its work product and its ability to integrate the experience of individuals from a number of disciplines such as buying a home in new jersey.

Some of the nation’s leading banks and financial institutions rely on us to handle their largest and most complicated litigation matters, including cases relating to fiduciary and trust issues, antitrust claims and loan servicing. These high-profile engagements have involved claims exceeding $1 billion and have included trial and other litigation victories. In addition,  has a long and successful record representing financial service clients in the area of consumer litigation, particularly in defending class actions and “private attorney general” actions. We are experienced in the rapidly developing law affecting such consumer claims and have obtained favorable results for clients in diverse markets.

We advise financial institutions on:

  • Secured and unsecured loans
  • Loan syndications
  • Leasing
  • Mezzanine, tax-exempt and project financing
  • Securities matters
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Regulatory matters
  • Securitizations
  • Credit enhancements
  • Other special purpose or alternative financing devices

Related Practice Groups:

At  we draw upon legal experience in multiple practice areas to build the best team for each of our clients. To learn more about related practice areas, please select from the links below.



Earlier this month, the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) released some tragic and startling statistics. Between Memorial Day and Labor Day of this summer, 137 children under the age of 15 drowned in swimming pool accidents. In addition, nearly 170 children in that age group required the efforts of emergency responders for injuries sustained in near-fatal accidents.

The chairperson of the CPSC recently elaborated on these statistics in a release to the public. She noted that “These figures are a strong indication that child drownings are a serious public health problem. We are losing too many children to drowning, tragically cutting short these young lives and leaving families devastated.”

She continued by saying that, “while summer is ending, our vigilance in ensuring that all children pool safely must not end. With so many indoor community pools, hotel pools and spas, indoor water parks, as well as outdoor pools that remain open in warm-weather states, we must continue our efforts to remind everyone to pool safely whenever they are near the water.”

What exactly does it mean to “pool safely?” Primarily, it means keeping an eye on kids while they are in the water. Thirty-one of the deceased children drowned in the presence of others, while an additional 54 died not long after leaving an adult who remained in their immediate area. It is not enough to simply be present while children are in the water. Adults must also pay strict attention to them.

It is important for adults to understand this critical fact. Please check back later this week as we discuss the CPSC’s vision for water safety in the coming year, which will include critical adult education on the issue.


Cycling Underneath the Impact in Washington State

Generally, Washington DUI regulations affect electric cars, but there are occasions when surfaces have to choose circumstances which are not only a little ordinary. As people may run numerous devices while underneath the impact of booze, medicines, or both dUI cases are available in all shades. From ships to lawn mowers, you will find several unusual ways of transport which have not been attempted for DUI. But think about one of transportation’s common ways that an engine is involved by doesn’t? California Cycling Laws their state of California identifies bike as “every system propelled exclusively by individual energy where an individual or individuals might experience,” consequently, a bicycle doesn’t count like a “motor vehicle.” there are certainly a quantity of regulations described from the Washington State Dept of Transport that try to maintain individuals secure, but remarkably, none identifies BUI, or “biking underneath the influence.” the only real law that referrals traffic regulations is RCW 46.61.755. This regulation allows every individual who trips exactly the same privileges as motorists to a bike, and claims they’re susceptible to the exact same duties which are relevant.

If I’m Captured Cycling underneath the Impact what Goes On?

Under RCW 46.61.790, the officer may offers intoxicated cyclists undergone by authorities transport if it’s apparent he’s drunk. Law enforcement officer could also provide release a the biker that is drunk to some qualified individual apart from the official herself. The official isn’t necessary to pressure help; on the other hand, any police force official who encounters a drunk biker in California who not desire to be assisted mustn’t offer assistance that isn’t approved. With this particular being stated, whenever you experience police force within this scenario probably the most that may occur is the fact that the official will offer you to consider you someplace secure or house. He might also request when you have buddies or any family unit members who might choose up you. Within the worst-case situation, the official may impound your bicycle if he seems there’s no more choice and that you’re a risk to yourself. Whenever you achieve sobriety in this instance, you are able to recover your bicycle. Where individuals are handled just as every other driver this image is noticeably distinctive from the exact same scenario in Florida. Drunk individuals in Florida could be billed with DUI/ DWI. If charged, individuals experience to be billed having a good of $250.00 along with a misdemeanor fines. This doesn’t depend like an electric DUI cost, that will be worse Individuals in California are secure from legal costs for biking underneath the impact. The important thing to all of this may be the motor vehicle’s state’s description. In Town of Montesano v. Wells, a cyclist’s DUI sentence was overturned because of the state’s reputation that the motor car means “every automobile that will be self-propelled.” an automobile that’s self propelled may continue its since it includes an engine, while a bike is driven by your personal pressure. An experienced lawyer might help you by creating a powerful legal protection should you encounter criminal costs in Washington.


Bumbo International Trust

Four million of the popular baby seats made by Bumbo International Trust are being recalled after reports that dozens of infants have fallen out of the seats and have suffered injuries in their falls. At least 19 of these infants suffered skull fractures.
The South-Africa based company says that its products are safe if used as they are meant to be used. The company says that the chairs are made to be placed on the floor. The chairs do not have restraints as they are designed as an easy-in easy-out infant chair. Unfortunately, nearly 100 incidents were reported to the Consumer Product Safety Commission in which children had fallen out of the chairs or wiggled their way out.
Forty-five of these incidents involved babies falling out of chairs placed on tables, countertops or chairs, and 17 of these infants suffered skull fractures. At least 50 falls, however, occurred when the seats were placed at an unknown elevation or on the ground. Two of these infants suffered skull fractures and one child suffered a concussion. Even falling near to the floor poses a brain injury danger to an infant because their skulls are soft and they have no way to break their fall and may hit their head on a toy or other object, seeking the help of Cleveland lawyers to assist.
People who own these chairs can order free repair kits from the company’s website. The repair kits contain a restraining belt and also a sticker that reminds parents and caregivers not to place the chair on an elevated surface.


Protecting your Charges Underage DUI License Suspension Hearing

Driver’s License Penalties

If your juvenile comes with an education permit or advanced driver’s permit (permit standing for motorists underneath the era of 18), an arrest or confidence for Small DUI might influence their capability to get yourself a regular permit later on. An arrest may also result in a suspension of driving rights along with a dependence on SR-22 insurance (high-risk car insurance). A confidence can lead to jail-time, probation, in addition to further charges, like the denial-of an advanced permit and limitations on existing driving privileges.

If your juvenile is charged of particular medication and liquor crimes whilst having an education permit (whether or not the offense was determined while driving), that individual is likely to be not able to be eligible for a driver’s permit till he/she has already reached age 18. Advanced permit holders convicted of Tacoma DUI encounter a permit suspension that amounts from 3 months to 2 decades, based on their legal background, in addition to extra limitations.

Reinstate License

1: Get Started Doing Online Application Help
Software help providers may simplify the procedure for all DOL associated solutions to get a charge, including: reviving your license, trying to get a license, joining an automobile, changing your license, altering much more and your target. Additional advantages include a regular journal along with a continuing regular publication addressing essential improvements that impact essential security guidelines, motorists, developments, legal improvements and methods to conserve money on automobile-related solutions.

2: By email
Some motorists would rather manage the restoration procedure by email, in the place of benefiting from help services, visiting with the DOL personally, or via services that are accessible. Support by email can be obtained with restrictions. Study below for specifics that are extra or visit with the local DOL.

3: Using A DOL office
In case your particular requirements need an in person visit, many, or even all, driver permit providers could be managed at the local DOL office. Different which means you will have to examine before your trip to make certain the DOL best for you DOL practices occasionally provide various kinds of providers offers the support you need. Additionally, if your DOL enables you to create a private visit you are able to contact to determine.


9th U.S. Circuit Court Immigration News

In U.S. immigration law news, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld an injunction against several key components of Senate Bill 1070 – Arizona’s highly controversial immigration law.
Senate Bill 1070 was officially signed into law by Arizona Governor Jan Brewer on April 23, 2010, and was scheduled to go into effect on July 29.
However, shortly after the bill was signed into law, the Justice Department sought a temporary injunction to prevent it from taking effect until it received a full review from the courts.
The presiding U.S. District Court Judge in the case, the Honorable Susan Bolton, granted the temporary injunction, holding that immigration matters were the domain of the federal government and that four provisions of Senate Bill 1070 were unconstitutional because they intruded upon this domain.
Specifically, Bolton’s temporary injunction covered the following four components of Senate Bill 1070:
• The section criminalizing efforts by undocumented immigrants to solicit, apply for or perform work
• The section creating a new crime of failing to apply for or possess “alien-registration papers”
• The section allowing law enforcement officials to make a warrantless arrest of a person where there is probable cause to believe that he or she committed a crime making them removable from U.S. soil
• The section mandating that all state law enforcement officials must make a reasonable attempt to ascertain the immigration status of anyone stopped, detained or arrested if there is reasonable suspicion that the person is an undocumented immigrant
The state of Arizona immediately appealed the issuance of the injunction to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Here, the appellate court ruled to uphold the temporary injunction, declaring the four components of Senate Bill 1070 to be unconstitutional.
“We simply are not persuaded that Arizona has the authority to unilaterally transform state and local law-enforcement officers into a state-controlled (Department of Homeland Security) force to carry out its declared policy of attrition,” wrote Judge Richard Paez.
The state of Arizona may now either may ask a larger panel of judges on the 9th Circuit to revisit the case (en banc) or pursue a direct appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States.
It is important to note that if the Supreme Court refuses to hear the case or if it upholds the entire decision of the 9th Circuit, the matter will return to the courtroom of Judge Bolton. Once here, the Justice Department could ask her to rule in its favor and issue a permanent injunction – something that would appear to be a near certainty in light of her prior decision.
In this scenario, the four components of Senate Bill 1070 would never become law.
Despite the latest setback, Arizona’s government officials have vowed to keep fighting.
“I’m pledged to work as hard as I can to bring the case to the U.S. Supreme Court and win it there,” said Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne.
Stay tuned for further developments in the area of U.S. immigration law …
Due to the continued complexity of immigration laws with respect to naturalization and the exposure to facing a denial of this petition, it is critical to speak with a legal professional who has extensive specialized knowledge and experience in immigration law.
This post was provided for informational purposes only and is not to be construed as legal advice and you should speak with a Vermont immigration law firm for more info.


Oregon Teen Driving

We’re continuing our discussion of graduated licensing and the surprising results of a recent study. In Oregon, teens can get a driver’s license at age 16, but it is a restricted license. The restrictions are meant to cut down on distractions — and accidents — as the teen matures and gets more experience behind the wheel.
A recent study, reviewed in our Sept. 22 post, shows that the graduated licensing approach is saving lives of 16- and 17-year-olds. It also shows that the decline in that age group is almost matched by the increase in fatalities among 18- and 19-year-olds. States with stricter programs actually logged higher fatalities of 18- and 19-year-olds than states with less restrictive programs.
These are just numbers, though — they don’t offer any reasons. When compared with other data, though, some possible explanations present themselves.
For example, in California, where the researchers were based, the graduated licensing program is particularly strong. According to the department of motor vehicles, 23 percent of 16-year-olds got their driver’s licenses. In 2007, the number had fallen to just 14 percent.
The logical conclusion: Kids are waiting longer before getting their licenses. The inexperience factor is still present.
A different study, though, had different results. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety found that strong programs translated into lower fatalities among 15- to 17-year-olds than weak programs, but the rate for 18- and 19-year-old drivers was the same for both programs.
Either way, more research is likely. Teens and young adults may demand it, if legislators listen to some of the researchers.
In one state, the restrictions apply to anyone under age 21 applying for a license. Why not introduce that in more states, or expand the restricted driving licenses to the older teens?
The challenge is that the older teens are legal adults. Imposing such restrictions on them could be more than an inconvenience — it could disqualify them from certain jobs but prevent them from needing a car accident attorney.
More research, perhaps, before more rules, said one researcher.